Search

State News

AIM case hearing set for December

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

VANCOUVER, British Columbia (AP) — An American Indian Movement activist charged with murder in South Dakota almost 30 years ago may learn more next month about the strength of the U.S. case against him.

John Graham is charged with first-degree murder in the 1975 killing of Anna Mae Pictou Aquash, a fellow AIM member, on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.

Another man, Arlo Looking Cloud, was convicted in February and was sentenced to life in prison.

Witnesses at Looking Cloud's trial testified that Graham shot Pictou Aquash in the back of the head as she begged for her life.

Graham pleaded not guilty and is fighting extradition. He is out on bail with strict conditions.

More than two weeks have been set aside for his extradition hearing in December. On Monday, lawyers were in court to make final arrangements for arguments related to that hearing.

Graham's lawyer, Terry LaLiberte, told Justice Elizabeth Bennett he will make an argument for fuller disclosure of evidence as well as a challenge to whether Canada's Extradition Act can allow hearsay evidence.

"I don't trust their client," LaLiberte told Bennett, referring to the U.S. government, which is represented in court by a federal Justice Department lawyer, Deborah Strachan.

Outside court, LaLiberte said he has been provided with an "overview" of the United States' case against Graham but he wants to know more fully "what they are going to rely on."

Aquash's death came amid a series of bloody clashes between federal agents and AIM, which called for treaty rights and self-determination for Indians.

Aquash, a Mi'kmaq from Nova Scotia, was among the Indian militants who occupied the village of Wounded Knee for 71 days in 1973.

Aquash's family exhumed her body last month from a South Dakota grave so she could be reburied in Nova Scotia.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement