Search

Local News

Subcommittee votes to delay meat labeling again

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

WASHINGTON — Rep. Stephanie Herseth, D-S.D., blasted a House subcommittee's approval late Monday night of a spending bill that includes another delay for mandatory country-of-origin labeling for meat and meat products. 

Mandatory labeling, originally intended to go into effect in 2004, was delayed last year to 2006.

"Mandatory COOL is on the books and should be implemented by now," Herseth said in a news release. "Unfortunately, House Republican leadership is siding with corporate agriculture interests and against the interests of family ranchers in South Dakota and across the country."

The new COOL provision approved by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture would prevent the secretary of agriculture from spending any money in fiscal year 2006 to implement the food labeling rule that was originally signed into law as part of the 2002 Farm Bill. 

The language would delay the start of any preparation for COOL until October 2006, according to Herseth spokesman Russ Levsen. "It would certainly be many months to ramp up a system like that, in effect, delaying implementation until sometime in 2007."

The spending bill now moves to the full House Appropriations Committee for consideration next week.

"This further delay makes clear that congressional leadership sides with the multinational meatpackers over family ranchers," Herseth said. "COOL is good for producers, good for consumers and good for America, and it should be implemented now."

Herseth also criticized the bill's cuts to conservation programs, with funding reduced to $794 million, a $37 million cut compared with fiscal 2005.

Herseth is a member of the House Agriculture Committee and its Horticulture and Livestock Subcommittee.

The National Farmers Union also criticized the House subcommittee vote. "Delaying mandatory country-of-origin labeling for meat is yet another missed opportunity to promote U.S. products," NFU president Dave Frederickson said. "The flood of imported food continues to enter the United States at record pace. Yet consumers have no way of distinguishing our high-quality U.S.-produced food from lower-quality imports."

The South Dakota Farmers Union and the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association also support mandatory country of origin labeling.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement