Search

Legislature News

Democrat: Rounds' plan undercuts food tax repeal

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

PIERRE (AP) - State government's budget director said the governor has told him to prepare two state budgets: one reflecting the possible repeal of the state sales tax on food and another that doesn't.

But state Sen. Garry Moore of Yankton, the Democratic leader in the Senate, said the move by Republican Gov. Mike Rounds is political and aimed at scaring the voters.

"I believe the two-budget issue is nothing more than a maneuver to continue to collect and spend money recklessly at the state level," Moore said. "I believe the dual budget is a political tactic to meet an agenda."

Democrats organized a successful petition campaign last year that resulted in a proposal on the Nov. 2 ballot to repeal the food tax. The move has drawn fire from Republicans.

Democratic Party leaders said the party will come up with a plan to sell the repeal measure to voters. Rounds has said the repeal could cost the state $42 million a year and take

$18 million or more from city sales tax income.

Repeal supporters say those numbers are high and that removing the tax could spur the economy in other areas. They also say cities could adjust their sales tax rates on other purchases to make up some of the loss.

Jason Dilges, Rounds' budget commissioner, recently told the Legislature's Interim Appropriations Committee that the governor had instructed him to prepare two budget options. State agencies soon will turn in funding requests for the fiscal year that begins July 1, 2005. Next year's Legislature will vote on that budget.

"Most likely, my budget recommendation will reflect what we would do if the sales tax on food is with us during session or if it is not with us," Dilges said.

Past administrations have offered double budgets, Moore said. "If you recall, one year, one budget called for projected increases in funding and revenue, the other was called austere in an effort to frighten the legislators and the public," he said.

"I believe the same tactics are going to be used now to frighten the public, and legislators, into believing the sky will fall if the sales tax on food is repealed by the voters in November."

Moore said supporters of federal tax relief label that as stimulating the economy.

"But to repeal the sales tax on food in South Dakota, like all our neighboring states, is called irresponsible and reckless by some," he said.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement