Search

State News

S.D. voting machines not linked to probe

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

SIOUX FALLS — South Dakota’s new electronic voting machines were not made by a company being investigated for possible ties to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Secretary of State Chris Nelson said.

Sequoia Voting Systems of Oakland, Calif., said the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States was conducting a formal inquiry into it and its parent company.

The inquiry was focusing on last year’s acquisition of Sequoia by Boca Raton, Fla.-based Smartmatic, which is owned by three Venezuelans, and whether Chavez’s leftist government has any influence over their operations.

Sequoia denies any connection to Chavez and said it wants the inquiry to dispel the rumors.

Chavez is a longtime foe of the Bush administration.

Nelson said the machines in question are not the ones used in South Dakota.

Sequoia’s touch-screen machines record and tally votes electronically. But South Dakota’s AutoMARK machines merely mark a paper ballot that people review after voting to ensure its accuracy, then put in the ballot box, Nelson said.

Congress in 2002 passed a mandate that requires each polling place to have at least one touch-screen machine so people with visual or other disabilities can cast their own ballot in secret.

Nelson said that when he considered the options, he chose a system that creates a paper ballot to ensure credibility, though some states have gone entirely high-tech.

“Would it have been enticing to do away with paper and go electronic? Yes,” he said. “But it’s not as safe and secure as the route we have gone.”

His top concern had been maintaining the integrity of the election process, Nelson said. If there are any questions, election boards can review the ballots manually.

“We want to make sure people are able to cast their vote as they intend and that their vote is counted as they intend,” he said.

Nelson said he also wanted machines that poll workers could easily set up and use.

Tuesday will be the first general election in which all 658 machines will be used. They were tested in local elections in Sioux Falls and Madison last spring and were available for statewide use in the June primary election.

Besides the touch-screen devices, the $4.6 million project also included ballot counting machines for 53 of the state’s 66 counties. The federal government paid 95 percent of the cost and counties paid for the rest, Nelson said.

In 11 counties, the machines allow Lakota-speaking voters to hear an interpretation of each item on the ballot, then cast their vote.

“That was a very difficult project to get all of the Lakota translated and get it incorporated on the machines,” Nelson said.

Though each polling place has a machine, voters still can have someone cast their ballot for them, he said.

The South Dakota Democratic Party plans to monitor election results to make sure the machines work well, Donald Carr, the party’s communication director, said.

“The secretary of state and board of elections have spent the time to make sure there are no problems, but we’ll be watching closely for accuracy and accountability,” he said.

Nelson said feedback about the machines has been generally positive.

Keith Bundy of Madison has been blind since birth and said that for the first time, he has been able to cast his own ballot.

Bundy, 49, is on the advisory board for South Dakota Service to the Blind and Visually Impaired. He said he has been voting since he was 18 but has had his wife or someone else he trusts fill out the ballot for him, until now.

“There’s just a feeling of independence and self confidence that comes when you know you’ve cast your own vote using the secret ballot system that our country has used since the Constitution was established. And I’ve never enjoyed that independence and self confidence until this year,” Bundy said.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement