Search

Top News

House committee nixes ‘camping cabins’ at Custer State Park

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

PIERRE--Part of a $12 million plan for improvements at Custer State Park is in jeopardy after a legislative committee voted to cut 50 new “camping cabins” from the proposal.

The camping cabins n with electricity but no running water -- would have cost about $700,000, but they would have generated an additional $1.1 million to help pay the cost of other improvements throughout the park.

However, campground owners, including Rep. Alan Hanks, R-Rapid City, objected to the plan, saying the cabins would compete unfairly with private businesses near the park.

“There’s always been a commitment from the folks at Custer State Park not to infringe on the private sector,” Hanks told the House Appropriations Committee.

Hanks and Rep. Jeff Haverly, R-Rapid City, who is on the appropriations committee, also cited an informal but documented agreement in 1987 between campground owners and the state Game, Fish & Parks Department that park officials would consult with campgrounds before expanding.

“I did not see that happening at all,” Haverly said.

Doug Hofer, director of the department’s Wildlife Division, warned of two consequences of cutting the cabins: either some park improvements would have to be cut or another source of funding would be needed. “The dilemma is, where that $1.1 million is going to come from,” he said. “I don’t have an answer for that.”

But Hanks argued that there had always been an agreement that the park would offer “rustic” campsites, with no services, leaving “the RV folks” to private campgrounds.

The improvements include adding 30 new rooms to the State Game Lodge, adding a group area for large outdoor events and building a new wedding pavilion at Sylvan Lake.

“You’re robbing from the private sector to basically subsidize the revenue from the concessionaire,” Hanks said.

A private concessionaire operates lodges in the park.

Hofer said increased fees to the concessionaire would pay for those improvements. “There is nothing in those camping cabins paying for those facilities,” he said. Cabin revenue would pay for other improvements such as electrical and plumbing renovations.

Hofer also said that 20 years ago electricity was considered an amenity at campsites, but today campers expect it. He said 3,100 of 3,400 campsites at state parks throughout South Dakota offer electricity.

In addition, Hofer pointed out that Custer State Park spends about $4.6 million a year against revenues of $3.7 million n a deficit of about $859,000. Cabin revenue, after it pays part of the bonds for the improvements, could be used to pay operating expenses at the park.

Still, the House Appropriations Committee voted 6 to 3 to strip the cabins from SB218.

Now the measure goes to the House floor.

The Senate already has passed SB218 in its original form. If the amendment remains in the final House version, a conference committee will have to reconcile the two bills.

Contact Bill Harlan at 394-8424 or at bill.harlan@rapidcityjournal.com

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement