Search

Opinions News

Officials let down community in the search for missing prof

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

In the sad and mysterious tale of Chadron State College professor Steve Haataja's life and untimely death, area residents are left with nearly as many questions as answers.

On March 9, more than three months after Haataja was reported missing, two ranchers found his body in a ravine southeast of the college near the outskirts of town.

Up until the discovery, authorities had little information about what happened to Haataja. There were no signs that he had planned on leaving town, no correspondences that pointed to foul play, no clues at all. After the body was found, it was revealed, too, that there had been very little effort by authorities to search for Haataja.

State and county officials say they were not asked to help in the investigation. Local police officials said they kept in contact with other law enforcement agencies but that the searches they did "were to put the word out." Regardless, the Nebraska State Patrol - which is in charge of the homicide investigation - is now facing significant obstacles in its efforts to find out what happened to Haataja.

As one forensic expert said, "Once the body starts decomposing, you're constantly losing information." And given that three months have passed, the likelihood that information has been lost is probable.

Part of the tragedy of Haataja's tale is that there were people willing to search for Haataja. One of them, Loren Zimmerman, was a homicide detective for the Los Angeles Police Department for 20 years. More than once, Zimmerman organized search teams that scoured the outskirts of Chadron in the days after the professor went missing.

However, the former detective said he was essentially waved off the investigation by local police. The local police department failed its community and the Haataja family with their thin investigation. The fact that the county and state did not assist in the search exposes what may be even larger problems in protocol and communications.

And ultimately, it is the family and friends of Steven Haataja who are left to suffer. Not only have they experienced grief of losing a loved one, but now, they may never know exactly what happened to Haataja because key evidence may no longer be available because of the time lapse involved.

It may be too late for their family, but we hope that the problems uncovered during this missing-person search are addressed at all levels of law enforcement in Nebraska.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement