Search

State News

Money may expire for tribal patrols

Previous
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

The Associated Press

WHITECLAY, Neb. — Once hailed as a historic step toward mopping up this alcohol-drenched village, a deal to allow tribal police to patrol it has instead gone the way of empty beer cans so visible in the area — ditched.

The agreement, signed nearly two years ago by Attorney General Jon Bruning, Gov. Dave Heineman and the then-president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, allows tribal police in the Pine Ridge Indian reservation to be deputized in Nebraska.

But the patrols never started, and now nearly $200,000 earmarked by Congress to pay for Pine Ridge officers to patrol the town is in danger of slipping away, unused.

“The way it was set up originally, it hasn’t taken place,” said Lance Moss, owner of Whiteclay Grocery.

Moss’ store neighbors four others that sell millions of cans of beer annually to residents of the reservation located just across the border in South Dakota.

Liquor is banned on the reservation, which has one of the highest alcoholism-related mortality rates in the country and is within walking distance of the stores. The 5,000-square mile reservation is home to about 15,000 Oglala Sioux.

The uneasy tie between the village and the reservation is complicated by jurisdictional issues. Problems in the area — where people are often passed out drunk on the sidewalks or begging for beer money — have been the subject of finger-pointing for decades.

Common alcohol offenses in Whiteclay include public consumption, selling to intoxicated people, bootlegging onto the reservation, the sale of alcohol on credit, sale to minors, public intoxication, trespassing, assault and theft.

But when the cross-deputization agreement was reached nearly two years ago, officials described it as an important breakthrough.

Cecilia Fire Thunder, Oglala Sioux Tribe president at the time, said it was “an important step forward in working together to address crime in the Whiteclay area.” Bruning called the agreement “historic.”

Tribal officials did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Former U.S. Rep. Tom Osborne, R-Neb., helped secure $200,000 over two years to cover the cost of Pine Ridge officers patrolling the town. But none of it has been spent to date, and deadlines loom.

Half of the money is expected to no longer be available to the tribe if, by the end of the month, the tribe doesn’t show it has incurred related expenses and has the pieces in place to do the work.

The other half could be lost by the beginning of October.


 

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement