Search

Opinions News

Water systems: pay now or pay more

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

Congress’s recent override of a presidential veto on a $23 billion water projects bill proves just how important spending on water infrastructure is to America.

President Bush vetoed the Water Resources Development Act, saying it was fiscally irresponsible and filled with too many special interest projects. Congress disagreed. The House of Representatives overrode the veto on Nov. 6; the Senate on Nov. 8.

No doubt there was plenty of pork in the bill — among the 900 different projects it authorizes were numerous beach resort improvements. But there are also critical water infrastructure projects, including one for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe that will ensure clean, safe drinking water for 14,000 people in four western South Dakota counties.

The WRDA authorizes $65 million to upgrade the Mni Waste Rural and Municipal Water System. For years, that antiquated and severely undersized water system has taken its water from the drought-stricken Cheyenne River. The new legislation allows the Army Corps of Engineers to relocate the water intake into the mainstream of the Missouri River instead, improving water quality and health as well as housing and economic development potential for the tribe.

Those kind of forward-looking infrastructure decisions are expensive to make, but imperative. Rapid City is facing them, too, as recent water system woes in the city prove.

An aging water delivery system that covers 397 miles and contains more than 9,000 control valves flows beneath the streets of Rapid City. It delivers more than 12 million gallons of water on a typical day, and if we want it to continue to do that into the future, we must invest in its maintenance today.

Whether it’s paying for a new water treatment plant at Jackson Springs or replacing block after block of crumbling sewer lines in the older parts of town, Rapid City is no different from many other cities facing big bills. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that America falls $22 billion short each year to update its water infrastructure.

But face it we must.

City residents expect to have clean, safe drinking water and sewer lines that work when they flush the toilet. We should also expect to pay for them, with water rate increases where necessary, along with a mix of state and federal monies. These are municipal  problems that require public,  not private, answers.

As America marks the 35th anniversary of the Clean Water Act this year, our biggest challenge may be in modernizing the municipal water systems that deliver that clean water to our homes.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement