Opinions News
Time to let cameras in court
del.icio.us
Digg
NewsVine
FarkWe urge the South Dakota Legislature to repeal a state law that bans cameras, both television and still photographs, in circuit courtrooms.
The first step in that repeal could come today, when the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to take up SB 77, a bill that would end the prohibition on radio or television broadcasting or newspaper photography of state judicial proceedings.
South Dakota has been slow to open its court system to cameras. In 2001, it became the last state in America to allow them in the chambers of its Supreme Court, and it is long past time that the state’s lower courts are also open to the media in this way.
South Dakotans should have the same direct access to the third branch of their government that other Americans enjoy — the ability to see and hear for themselves what transpires in a court of law during a trial or proceeding that is grabbing headlines.
It may sound self-serving whenever a media outlet calls for better access and greater openness in government, but it would be a mistake to view cameras in the courtroom merely as a special privilege for the media. They are, instead, a protection for the rights of all Americans. Give the public the ability to reach their own conclusions about guilt or innocence in high profile trials and, as the televised accounts of O.J. Simpson’s murder trial proved, they usually will.
While the Simpson trial is often cited as an example of what is wrong with televised court proceedings, we think cameras in the courtroom, painful as it may be for participants at the time, ultimately serves the cause of justice if only by exposing the miscarriage of justice.
By all accounts, media access to state Supreme Court sessions has been a much more sedate, and more successful experiment. If it has worked well in that setting, we think establishing similar parameters in circuit courtrooms will, too.
We think members of the Judiciary Committee should support SB 77 and help open the state courtrooms to more thorough media coverage.
The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.
Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.
If you don't see your comment, perhaps...
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy