Search

Top News

Teens who posted street fights on YouTube may face charges

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email



Rapid City police are recommending criminal charges for a group of teens who allegedly planned and participated in fights behind the Rapid City Public Library and then posted videos of the fights on YouTube.

The fights occurred March 25 on public and private property in and near the 600 blocks of Kansas City and Quincy streets, according to the Rapid City Police Department. 


The video shows people in the alley behind the library and later in the parking lot of the First United Methodist Church.


Eight different clips of footage were posted on the popular video Web site shortly after that, according to Lt. David Walton. He said charges against the 14 teens, whose ages range from 15 to 17, include disorderly conduct, trespassing and unlawful assembly.


Petitions were submitted to the Pennington County State's Attorney recommending charges for those who participated in and taped the fights. A citizen's report led to the investigation.


No serious injuries happened during the fights, according to Walton.


The teens attend different Rapid City high schools, Walton said.


He said investigators had reason to bring charges against the group of teens even though the fights were mutually agreed upon by the participants.


"This is something our kids shouldn't be doing," Walton said. "It's dangerous. Somebody could get hurt."


Walton said the disorderly conduct charge is being recommended because fighting causes public alarm and annoyance. The unlawful assembly charges stem from the group organizing with "criminal intent," Walton said, and the group was trespassing because the property adjacent to where they gathered was marked private.


He said the parents of the teen who allegedly posted the fights made their child shut down his or her YouTube account. But Walton said he doesn't believe he has the authority to make YouTube take the fight videos down. 


This isn't the first time Rapid City police have had problems with kids organizing fights and posting them on the Internet. He said a similar incident occurred near Canyon Lake last year.


Walton said some of the participants in those fights ended up with more serious injuries.


In light of the recent incident, Rapid City police plan on patrolling the area behind the library more heavily. That area has been a problem in the past, Walton said.


 


Contact Ryan Woodard at 394-8412 or ryan.woodard@rapidcityjournal.com.


 


Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement