Search

Top News

Ruling says state court can handle divorce of Native American man on reservation

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

A state circuit court has jurisdiction to handle a divorce case involving a Native American man and a non-Native woman who lived on Lower Brule Sioux Indian Reservation, the South Dakota Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

The high court also said Circuit Judge Lori Wilbur of Pierre must hold hearings and enter written findings on factual and legal issues before giving a tribal court jurisdiction over some issues involving child custody and protection orders.

Jay and Deann Langdeau were married in 1998 and lived on private land within the external boundaries of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe's reservation until February 2007. Jay is an enrolled member of the tribe, and Deann is a non-Native, according to court records.

The couple has two children.

Deann Langdeau left the reservation and filed for divorce in state circuit court in Lyman County on Feb. 27, 2007. Her husband filed for divorce the next day in tribal court.

Deann Langdeau also got a state court protection order against her husband, alleging he had abused or endangered her or their children. Jay Langdeau got a tribal court order establishing a schedule of when he could visit the children.

Circuit Judge Wilbur ruled that the state court system did not have jurisdiction over the divorce and child custody proceedings because the family had lived within the reservation's external boundaries for most of the six months prior to the filing of the divorce case.

Wilbur also ruled that tribal court would be the appropriate place for the legal cases because state court would be an inconvenient forum.

The circuit judge later issued an order recognizing some of the tribal court's orders. The tribal court eventually granted Jay Langdeau a divorce.

The Supreme Court ruled the circuit judge could decide to dismiss the child custody proceeding because the children had lived on the reservation, but the high court said the state court can preside over the divorce case.

Deann Langdeau is a non-Native who is a South Dakota resident, so the state has had jurisdiction at all times over her divorce, the Supreme Court said. She filed for divorce in state court a day earlier than her husband filed in tribal court, the justices said.

"Since Deann's complaint filed in Lyman County was first and it was properly commenced, the circuit court may not refuse to hear the divorce proceeding," Chief Justice David Gilbertson wrote for the court.

In addition, the circuit judge must gather evidence and issue written findings on facts and the legal issues before declining temporary emergency jurisdiction on child custody, the high court said. Deann Langdeau had alleged her husband had abused her and drank alcohol to the extent that he endangered the children, the court said.

The circuit judge also must gather evidence and issue written findings before recognizing a tribal court protection order, the Supreme Court said.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement