Search

Opinions News

Wind turbines serve reservation, state

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

Pine Ridge Indian Reservation joined the growing list of wind turbine sites in the state last week with the installation of its first wind turbine.

Pine Ridge and the state’s other reservations have a unique opportunity to develop wind energy in South Dakota because they can produce more energy than they need on site and they have the need for the economic development.

And while the development of wind resources on Pine Ridge is clearly good for the reservation, it’s also good for the state.

South Dakota’s wind is harnessed at several sites across the state: Chamberlain, Howard, Canova, Gary, Highmore, Rosebud Sioux Reservation, Brookings County’s Minn-Dakota Wind Farm and Tatanka wind farm in McPherson County.

Gary Hanson, chairman of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission sees wind development in the state as both a challenge and an opportunity and sees reservations playing a role in the development of wind energy.

We hope the first wind turbine on Pine Ridge isn’t the last. In the short term, it’s good for the community as it will provide some economic stimulus. In the long term, it’s one more piece of the puzzle to successfully developing alternative sources of energy – in this case wind in South Dakota.

“Wind capacity opportunities in South Dakota, according to WEA (American Wind Energy Association), is in the top four in the states in the U.S.,” Hanson said. “So we have a tremendous opportunity to develop wind in South Dakota.”

The challenge now is to get that energy to market. As more sites like Pine Ridge come online, both the state and energy providers will have more interest in getting the lines in place to transmit the excess energy.

Case in point is Big Stone II at the far northeastern part of the state. That project is contingent on the construction of excess transmission lines for renewable energy such as wind. So while the plant is providing the energy for our energy-starved region, it is also helping to pave the road for the future of alternative energy.

The development of alternative energy needs to be pursued without hesitation, especially in South Dakota.

On Pine Ridge, the wind project started about eight years ago with a wind study to determine placement of the turbine. That was good planning years ago that has finally come to fruition. One turbine brings opportunity that will only be fully realized when multiple turbines are built. At that point, the excess energy created will be sold to neighboring states and more jobs are created on Pine Ridge.

On Pine Ridge, president of the Intertribal Council on Utility Policy Pat Spears said he hopes the turbine is only the first of many to be built on South Dakota’s reservations.

We hope it’s not the last, too.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement