Search

Local News

Judge to decide if Dillon received fair trial

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

Seventh Circuit Judge Janine Kern will decide if a jury followed proper procedure last May when it convicted a Rapid City man of raping four young girls in 1998. 

Farrell Dillon, 49, was convicted of three counts of criminal pedophilia and two counts of first-degree rape May 19 after a weeklong trial.

It was the second time Dillon had gone on trial for the accusations. He appealed his first conviction on the grounds that his first lawyer was incompetent, and he was granted a second trial by the state Supreme Court.

Dillon's attorney, Tim Rensch of Rapid City, has filed a motion for a new trial, alleging that the jury considered outside evidence when convicting Dillon.   

He said jurors found out about the conviction from the media or another source outside of the courtroom and discussed it in deliberations. Jurors were told during pre-trial instructions not to pay attention to media coverage of the trial. 

Rensch said he learned in a post-trial interview with jurors that the jury discussed the conviction in deliberations.  

"When you have a jury that uses outside information about the specific facts of the case, then that goes to the very heart of whether their deliberation can be fair," he said.

Pennington County Deputy State's Attorney Scott Roetzel said jurors were aware of the previous conviction anyway, because it was brought up during the proceedings in May.

He said any knowledge jurors had of the first conviction is insignificant compared to the full week of testimony they heard from expert witnesses and others.

"In the big picture, it's irrelevant, based on the weight of the evidence," he said.

Kern could decide about the trial request Thursday, July 17, or delay the decision in order to further interview jurors in the case. 


Contact Ryan Woodard at 394-8412 or ryan.woodard@rapidcityjournal.com

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement