Search

Local News

Alderman looks to limit travel budget, change policy

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

The Rapid City council's proposed 2009 travel budget is recommended to be reduced by $15,000, but one alderman said more work should be done to set limits on council members' travel habits.

Alderman Bob Hurlbut said Tuesday he wants to reduce the $45,000 council travel budget and also advocates a change in travel policy to limit the number of out-of-state seminars individual members may attend in a given year.

"Frankly, I'm still concerned it may be more than we need to spend. We have a fairly experienced council; in fact, we have just one new council member," Hurlbut said.

In June, Hurlbut noted the council's image problem concerning travel and suggested the city should adjust its policy.

The city's travel budget has been scrutinized since last fall, when Hurlbut and Alderman Sam Kooiker questioned sending eight of 11 elected officials to the New Orleans National League of Cities conference. Only five council members actually attended, but the issue sparked a debate about sending a quorum of the governing body out of town at the same time.

So far, no changes have been made to travel policy. Most council members believe travel is a budget issue that should be discussed when the budget is prepared.

Last November, Mayor Alan Hanks proposed a policy change to limit the number of council members who travel out of state at one time, but the proposal was tabled by the legal and finance committee.

Hurlbut said the educational offerings of seminars have value, especially as a primer for new elected officials on a variety of issues. He favors sending new council member Patti Martinson to some seminars, if she wants to go, but said the council should create a policy governing how often people travel.

"I think perhaps a policy of no more than one national seminar per council person in any given year is more than appropriate," Hurlbut said.

Two budgeting sessions are scheduled for Monday and Tuesday, Aug. 11 and 12. Hurlbut expects travel to be one of the issues discussed, but if little progress is made, he believes the issue will probably reappear on a future legal and finance committee agenda.

"I don't want to discourage travel, but I also think we need to be responsible. We've seen a lot of public concern that I think we need to acknowledge."


Contact Scott Aust at 394-8415 or scott.aust@rapidcityjournal.com

 

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement