Search

Local News

Opponents spar over ballot measure 10.

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

The emotional side of the Initiated Measure 10 campaign surfaced Monday night in Rapid City during an often-testy debate between former state Rep. Tom Hennies and former U.S. Senate candidate Sam Kephart.

Kephart, a Spearfish businessman who lost the Republican U.S. Senate primary to Joel Dykstra in June, offered a fiery defense of the proposed law. In a voice that sometimes rose almost to a shout, he said the measure’s restrictions on the awarding of government contracts and use of taxpayer money for lobbying would help citizens wrest power from “the hands of the business and political elite” in South Dakota.

Well-connected business owners trade political contributions and the promise of high-paying jobs in the private sector for no-bid state government contracts, sometimes amounting to many millions of dollars, Kephart said. It’s an arrangement where insiders win and most taxpayers lose, he said.

“You better believe there is a cabal of influential business people who are pulling the strings behind the scenes,” Kephart said.

Hennies, a former Rapid City police chief who served eight years as a Republican member of the South Dakota House of Representatives, was no less spirited in his response. He rejected the notion of widespread corruption and wasteful sweetheart deals between business and state government in Pierre.

“I’ve been there. I know it doesn’t happen,” he said. “And especially it doesn’t happen in the way is intimated in this measure.”

Hennies said the initiative is a copycat measure tried in other states and developed by shadowy interests based outside of South Dakota who won’t identify themselves. Under the guise of making government more open and accountable, provisions in the measure would stifle speech and disenfranchise people who hold legitimate government contracts, as well as their families, he said. They also would eliminate lobbying options vital to many state and local government officials, Hennies said.

“What this measure really is, ladies and gentlemen, is a gag law,” he said.

The debate was held at the St. Isaac Jogues Catholic Church and sponsored by the local chapter of the South Dakota Peace and Justice Center. About two dozen people attended.

Contact Kevin Woster at 394-8413 or kevin.woster@rapidcityjournal.com

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement