Search

Local News

Sturgis council passes pit bull ordinance

City says it hopes to ensure responsible pit bull ownership and safety of citizens.

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

STURGIS -- The Sturgis City Council on Monday unanimously passed the second and final reading of an ordinance placing stringent regulations on the owners of pit bulls within city limits.

Mayor Maury LaRue made clear that the city's intention is to hold owners responsible for their pets, not to ban the breed from Sturgis.

According to Sturgis Animal Control Officer Curt Nulle, the number of attacks on dogs and humans by pit bulls has steadily increased in the past few years. Nulle's statistics show pit bulls have been the main breed responsible for canine attack incidents within the city. In fact, he said there's been one pit bull attack on a human and one on another dog just since the council's last meeting.

The ordinance defines the pit bull breed and requires registration of any dog within city limits that fits the description. Pit bulls will need to be securely confined indoors, or in a secure enclosed fence, pen or kennel. When outside the approved enclosure the pit bull must be on a leash no longer than four feet and will not be allowed to be kept on the leash outside the kennel area unless the owner is in physical control of it. Owners will be required to carry $250,000 of public liability insurance, place a public sign on their property stating the breed of the dog, and provide the animal control officer with identification photographs of the dog.

Sturgis resident and pit bull owner Jason Klingenberg told the council that he agrees that owners should be responsible for their dogs but opposed a breed-specific ordinance. Saying he is a responsible owner, Klingenberg said he already carries liability insurance on his pit bulls and doesn't have a problem with that requirement but said, "To push (regulations) towards one breed is not fair." He urged the council to make all dog owners comply with the regulations they planned to impose only on pit bull owners.

Judi Bendt of Piedmont called the insurance requirement of the ordinance "unconstitutional." She said that after contacting area insurance agents, she was unable to find anyone willing to provide a liability policy for pit bulls. Bendt said that Sturgis is no different than any other community and that the problem is "dogs at large, not a pit bull problem." She encouraged the council to raise fines for dogs at large rather than impose a breed-specific ordinance.

Animal Control Officer Nulle informed council that he had researched the issue and insurance policies for pit bulls are available locally. Nulle also said that ordinances regulating pit bulls had been tried elsewhere and have held up in court.

"It might have been easier to ban pit bulls altogether, but I didn't want to do that," he said.

Nulle said that because of breeding and genetics, pit bulls have aggression issues and that passing this ordinance will help reduce attacks and ensure the safety of Sturgis residents.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement