Search

Local News

Federal grand jury re-indicts suspect in AIM killing

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

Federal prosecutors have filed a superceding indictment against John Graham, again charging him in the 1975 slaying of activist Annie Mae "Anna" Aquash.

Graham, 52, was supposed to go on trial this week in U.S. District Court for the murder of Aquash, a fellow American Indian Movement activist whose body was found near Wanblee on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Aquash, 30, had been shot in the head.

But after a last-minute motion filed last week by defense attorney John Murphy, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Piersol canceled Graham's trial because of problems with the indictment.

Both Graham and Aquash were Canadian citizens and members of Canadian tribes, but the original indictment did not show that either was a member of a federally recognized Native American tribe. For a crime that occurs on the reservation to be tried in federal court, either the defendant or the victim must be Native American; otherwise, the state has jurisdiction.

Murphy argued that the federal government did not have jurisdiction based on the indictment.

Within hours of the judge's ruling last Friday, prosecutors filed a complaint against Graham that included an affidavit signed by a Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI agent.

On Tuesday, a federal grand jury issued a superceding indictment that charges Graham and Vine Richard Marshall, also known as Dick or Dickie Marshall, with committing or aiding the first-degree murder of Aquash in December 1975.

The indictment lists three alternative counts. One alleges federal jurisdiction over Graham and Marshall based on Indian status; the second alleges jurisdiction over Graham based on Aquash's Indian status; and the third alleges jurisdiction over Graham based on his aiding and abetting others who are Indians, including Marshall, Fritz Arlo Looking Cloud and Theda Nelson-Clarke, in Aquash's murder.

All of the counts carry a mandatory penalty of life in prison.

Looking Cloud was convicted at trial in 2004 and is serving a mandatory life sentence. Nelson-Clarke lives in a nursing home in Nebraska and has not been charged. Marshall is scheduled for trial Feb. 24.

The superceding indictment eliminates the need for Graham's preliminary hearing, which was scheduled for Oct. 17.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement