Search

Election News

Poll: McCain has edge in South Dakota

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

South Dakota, which hasn't given its electoral votes to a Democratic presidential candidate since 1964, likely won't break that streak this year, according to the results of a new independent poll.

Republican Sen. John McCain led Sen. Barack Obama 48 percent to 41 percent in a poll conducted last week among 800 South Dakota registered voters.

The random telephone poll, conducted for Argus Leader Media and KELO-TV of Sioux Falls by Mason-Dixon Polling and Research of Washington, D.C., has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

Obama's state campaign chairman, Matt McGovern, would not comment, saying the campaign typically doesn't talk about poll numbers.

Tom Steward, regional spokesman for McCain, said his campaign is working hard and taking nothing for granted.

He said Obama "just doesn't sync up with most South Dakota voters. It's a pattern we're seeing in other Western states."

People in the West want a candidate who supports gun rights, low taxes and a balanced energy policy that includes domestic resources, according to Steward.

McCain's lead is smaller than the final margin in the two most recent presidential elections in South Dakota, when George W. Bush defeated his Democratic opponents by more than 20 percentage points.

The poll is a snapshot, said Rick Hauffe, South Dakota Democratic Party executive director, said the McCain campaign is collapsing nationwide. South Dakota could be in play by Nov. 4, he said.

"I think whoever wins South Dakota — and it could be either one of them — will win by about 2 points," Hauffe said. "I think there's a chance now that Obama can take South Dakota."

Obama lost to Sen. Hillary Clinton in South Dakota's June primary.

"I don't think Obama is going to win South Dakota, but I think it's going to be closer than people think," said Gary Aguilar, an associate professor of political science at South Dakota State University.

Polling in the presidential race could be more difficult than in past years due to an expected increase in young voters and other groups that don't vote at high levels, he said. It all depends on voter turnout, Aguilar said.

"I wouldn't be surprised if Obama won by 20 percent or lost by 8 percent" nationally, Aguilar said. "This one is just so wild, it makes it difficult to predict what's going to happen."

McCain leads in western South Dakota 55 percent to 36 percent, and in the southeast, his lead was 52 percent to 37 percent.

Obama led 47 percent to 40 percent in the northeast and in the Sioux Falls metro area 47 percent to 32 percent.

Fourteen percent of Democrats polled said they support McCain.

Hauffe said he doubts there are many disaffected Clinton supporters now backing McCain. Instead, he thinks McCain's support comes from anti-abortion Democrats.

Fifty-one percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of McCain, with 30 percent unfavorable. Forty-two percent had a favorable opinion of Obama, and 39 percent had an unfavorable opinion.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement