Search

Opinions News

Credit card rules changes make sense

Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

Some credit card providers are crying foul over proposed rules changes designed to protect consumers but it looks like those companies will have to buck up and get ready to change.

It appears there’s ample support for credit card rules changes that would give card users some protection from practices that result in higher fees and missed payments.

The rules changes, proposed by the Federal Reserve and other  regulatory agencies, would protect consumers from certain interest rate increases, give users more notice of changes in terms and they would also change existing practices in assessing penalty fees, late charges and interest payments.

The changes make sense to protect credit card users from exorbitant, possibly hidden fees card users have been conditioned to accept for the past several years.

Fairer practices make sense as a rule, of course. But in today’s uncertain economy fairer practices should be considered tantamount to a successful economic recovery.

Why would we, as a country,   decide credit card users shouldn’t be given a plate of fair practices (not a handout) to manage credit card debt when so many other hands are out for a free lunch?

Some think the regulation goes too far. Already, Gov. Mike Rounds and Sen. John Thune have raised the alarm and met with regulators. Rounds said the rules changes —   primarily the one that restricts how a company can charge fees — could cost jobs at South Dakota’s Premier Bankcard.

Sen. Tim Johnson, who sits on the Senate banking committee, said through his spokeswoman he’s concerned about unfair practices but is concerned the rules are balanced and fair.

In South Dakota, there has been a clear indication from Gov. Rounds that the “helping people” portion of the state budget won’t be trimmed. Realize that those same people need help with credit card rules; let’s not forget that.

The days of nonchalant spending based on easy credit are over, for the foreseeable future at least. In the meantime, credit card companies will have to run a business based on more consumer friendly practices — and we hope the practices continue even after the economy recovers.

We also hope credit card users show some common sense in spending and change the “buy now, pay later” patterns many have resorted to in the past.

The Federal Reserve Board is expected to vote on the changes in the next week but don’t expect any relief this year.

Credit card companies may have up to a year to implement the changes, if approved by the board. Let’s hope they are.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement