HomeNewsLocal

Strategy aimed at gaining testimony against broker Douglas E. Andrews

Prosecution moves to switch order of highway-land bribery trials

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
PIERRE - The attorney general's office has made an unusual move so it can switch the order in which two men will be tried on charges alleging bribery in the state's purchase of land for a highway project along Interstate 90 near Rapid City.
Clayton R. Sonnenschein, 61, a former state Transportation Department official from Pierre, and Douglas E. Andrews, 62, a real-estate broker from Rapid City, were both indicted in May on seven charges of bribery and one count of grand theft.
Sonnenschein was in charge of state land purchases for work along I-90 near Piedmont, and prosecutors allege that Sonnenschein got a percentage of Andrews' commissions for the land sales.
Both men have pleaded not guilty.
Circuit Judge Kathleen Trandahl scheduled Andrews' trial to start Nov. 26 and Sonnenschein's trial to start Feb. 4.
Assistant attorney general Todd Love then filed to dismiss charges against Andrews and said charges will be refiled later against the broker. That would allow Sonnenschein's trial to be held first.
Prosecutors want to finish the prosecution of Sonnenschein so they can force him to testify in Andrews' trial, Love said Wednesday.
A brief court hearing was held by telephone Wednesday so Andrews' lawyer, Robert Van Norman of Rapid City, could record his objection to the state's plans. Trandahl did not make any ruling during the hearing because no formal motion was pending.
Van Norman said a further delay in Andrews' trial would cause financial hardship for the broker and could violate some of his constitutional rights. The state's move to dismiss the charges and refile them is an attempt to get around the speedy trial rule, which generally requires that a trial be held within 180 days of a defendant's first appearance in court.
Andrews has lost a lot of business because he has agreed to the suspension of his real-estate license, so he needs to resolve the charges against him and clear his name, Van Norman said.
"My client has not been cleared," Van Norman said. "He's not had his day in court."
The prosecution's plan to refile charges and hold Andrews' trial later could also cause problems because publicity surrounding Sonnenschein's trial could make it difficult to find an impartial jury for the second trial, he said.
Love said state law gives the prosecution discretion to dismiss a case.
"The prosecution against Mr. Andrews is simply terminated," Love said during the hearing.
When charges against Andrews are refiled, the court can deal with the legal issues raised by Van Norman, Love said.
Prosecutors told Andrews' lawyer early in the case that they would seek to hold Sonnenschein's trial first, Love said.
Andrews is accused of paying more than $47,000 in bribes from March through August 2005 to Sonnenschein, who at the time was in charge of the Transportation Department's land purchases along I-90 near Rapid City. Sonnenschein is charged with accepting bribes.
In the seven charges of bribery, the state alleges that Sonnenschein got a percentage of Andrews' commission for the land sales. The grand-theft count alleges that the two men caused the Transportation Department to buy some land for $420,000 more than its appraised value.
Each count carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine, authorities said.

Print Email

/news/local
 
Sponsored by:

Connect with Us