Joe Kafka, The Associated Press | Posted: Friday, June 8, 2007 11:00 pm
|
PIERRE - Robin Shrake knew something wasn't quite right when
she received a flier this spring with a stern notice about
hand-washing posters she'd need for her Sturgis convenience
store.
"I keep up with state requirements, and I thought it looked
fishy," said Shrake, the manager of the Kick Start Travel Center in
Sturgis.
The official-looking mailing offered hand-washing posters from
something called the South Dakota Food Service Compliance Center.
The posters cost $19.95 each, plus $2.95 shipping.
The notice typically begins with: ADVISORY TO ALL FOOD
LICENSEES!
Shrake didn't bite. She called the South Dakota Retailers
Association, which told her that notices about required
hand-washing posters from the South Dakota Food Service Compliance
Center are a crafty scheme by a company trying to make an easy
buck.
"It infuriates me," she said. "It's really sad because a lot
of businesses could get this information and assume that it's
something that's required by law."
It was all part of a long-running scam of small individual
consequence - a mere $20 to $60 per business. But add it up across
the nation, and the sum easily could have reached into hundreds of
thousands of dollars, perhaps more.
The concept: Trick businesses that serve food into thinking
they must purchase and display posters on proper hand-washing
procedures or face possible heavy fines and other sanctions. To the
unsuspecting, they might have come from a government agency or a
firm closely connected with the government.
In reality, the misleading sales pitches were from a Lansing,
Mich., firm that has been successfully sued for questionable
practices and has settled in several states by agreeing to change
its ways.
Many of the businesses that bought posters from the Mandatory
Poster Agency, also known as the Food Service Compliance Center and
various other names, have gotten their money back.
The Michigan firm gets a local post office box and adapts its
name to correspond to each state where it seeks customers.
The firm, however, insists to The Associated Press that it
provides a valuable service by researching government regulations
and providing the information to businesses wanting to be sure they
comply with food-safety and labor regulations.
That spin does not impress state authorities who have cracked
down on MPA. Kentucky, Michigan and Illinois have gotten court
orders this year to throttle the firm. It was the second time in
recent years that Michigan authorities sued the business.
The firm also has been fined by several states.
In South Dakota, businesses were warned last month not to be
hoodwinked by the poster company.
Officials in several states have forced MPA to provide refunds
to businesses that purchased the deceptive food-safety
posters.
"We sued them and got a temporary restraining order," said
Maryellen Mynear, litigation branch manager in the Kentucky
attorney general's office. "Their lawyer said they really didn't
have any defense. We had them fairly dead-to-rights, so to speak,
in terms of misrepresentations."
When the lawsuit was filed in October, Kentucky Attorney
General Greg Stumbo said MPA's solicitations contained false and
misleading information.
"These mailings were sent for the purpose of scaring small
businesses into ordering posters which are not required by law,"
Stumbo said.
Neither state nor federal law requires posting of hand-washing
notices, said Shawn Lyons, SDRA executive director. If businesses
want to post such notices, they can be obtained free from various
sources or can be homemade, he said.
Mandatory Poster Company is one of many firms trying to trick
business owners into buying products or services, Lyons said.
"These scam artists are a dime a dozen," Lyons said. "It's a
constant issue for small businesses."
SDRA has 3,800 members, and they often are quick to contact
the organization to see if they're being scammed or to report
scams, he said.
"We've stepped up our efforts to make businesses aware of the
perils," Lyons said. "We have a close relationship with the
attorney general's office and Better Business Bureau, and that
comes in handy when something suspicious like this poster offer
comes along."
A recorded message at MPA informs potential customers that its
hand-washing mailers "contained certain inaccuracies."
Responding in writing to an Associated Press interview
request, Thomas Fata, Mandatory Poster Agency president, said it
has changed its marketing practices throughout the country "to
ensure that there is no reasonable possibility of a
misunderstanding on the part of the potential customer."
The firm's new advertising flier makes it clear that MPA is
not a government agency nor does it hold a government contract, and
it states that many safety and labor posters that are required can
be obtained free from government agencies.
"There is absolutely nothing misleading about our advertising
circular," Fata wrote. "The overwhelming majority of our customers
are completely satisfied with their purchase."
In Kentucky, a February court order forbids the firm from
sending solicitations with "false, misleading or deceptive
information" to businesses.
All Kentucky businesses that ordered posters from the Michigan
firm got their money back as a result of the order, said Wanda
Delaplane, an assistant attorney general who handled the case. The
refunds totaled about $12,000.
Small businesses can be easy prey for scammers who use
questionable sales tactics, she said.
"They concentrate on small business people who are seeking to
run their businesses correctly, and most of them are extremely busy
and don't want to run afoul of any regulations," Delaplane
said.
Michigan obtained a court order against MPA last month. The
order requires refunds and prohibits the firm from deceptive
marketing practices. Illinois and North Carolina reached similar
legal settlements with the firm in February, and Idaho did likewise
in March; North Dakota ordered MPA to clean up its act last
September.
Officials in other states took aim much earlier at MPA. West
Virginia authorities won an agreement for refunds in 2001 after
determining that the firm engaged in "wide range of unlawful
practices."